I'm interested in…

  • Strategy & Procedure
  • Catastrophic Injury
  • Professional Indemnity
  • Motor
  • Fraud
  • Disease
  • Liability
  • Commercial Insurance
  • Costs
  • Local Authority
  • Scotland

Reversionary Interests – A Guide

Last month we looked at the issues currently being considered by the Court of Appeal in Swift v Carpenter, and concluded that the court is likely to accept a reversionary interest model which values the accommodation claim on the basis of a deduction from damages for the full capital cost of the new accommodation to reflect the value of a reversionary interest in the property.

The key question therefore is, how does one value a reversionary interest on the open market?

Whilst there is currently a small and apparently shrinking market (seven interests sold since 2015 according to the respondent's skeleton argument) in which a small number of investors seek a 6 to 7% return, our view is that level of return and the small size of the current market is likely to represent one end of the spectrum for the court to adopt.

An alternative approach might be based on a mixed investment portfolio. The expert evidence dealt with the mixed investment approach in the context of striking a balance between competing interests, although critically that is not the purpose of compensatory damages. This approach to valuing the reversionary interest also relies on analysing investment returns on a given day; with the exercise to be repeated at e.g. settlement meetings, schedule, and trial. The defendant's expert's investment return rate was in the region of 1.1 to 1.3%.

A third way might be to look at a fair and reasonable valuation based on a notional rental yield. The difficulty with that approach will be trying to identify the net rental yield given that a commercial landlord will allow for items such as maintenance within a rental figure and expert evidence would be necessary to determine the net yield excluding such items. The expert evidence presented to the court suggested a figure of around 3% yield using this approach.

Drawing this together, our best guess at this stage would be that we will end up with a formula for valuing the reversionary interest utilising a compromise investment yield rate of around 3 to 3.5% (the approximate midpoint of the various rates used in the reversionary interest valuation models above).

The reserved judgment is unlikely to be handed down for several weeks, and we will provide a further update when it lands.

Contact

For more information please Giles Kellner, Partner, Giles Kellner@dwf.law 

This information is intended as a general discussion surrounding the topics covered and is for guidance purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. DWF is not responsible for any activity undertaken based on this information.

Top